proftpd integration test server #1008
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is the integration test server proftpd.
Supports passive and TLS, just like the vsftpd.
These servers are totally standardized, same base image debian, same port ranges, same user and password, same everything (nearly). No more pandering to the different environment variable concepts of the image provider out on the web. Updates easy to get simply by removing and rebuilding.
Switched to an OpenSsl self signed certificate with long duration for the servers.
Fixed some unclean stuff in vsftpd, also.
I know that debian:bullseye-slim is smaller, but I preferred the official debian docker image.